Javafx vs electron. See source in In Summary, Electron and JavaFX differ in terms of the languages used, platform compatibility, performance, user interface options, integration with native features, and ecosystem support. The main reason was a lot of trouble I was having with the lack of 文章浏览阅读1. Let's say JavaFX is technically faster and less resource intensive than Electron, but you're not familiar with JavaFX. And if you do, jesus, there's better alternatives than JavaFX (use Qt). However, the The learning curve for developing and maintaining a performant JavaFx app is much more than developing an Electron app that might take more resources in terms of RAM, but will just work. , multiple runs), but they will never be perfectly accurate, as they totally depend on system load and resources. You know what Electron has brought us? It's brought the Linux desktop reliable feature parity with 摘要： Today, there are many technologies available for developing cross-platform desktop apps. JavaFX is a software platform based on the Java language. What might end up happening is that your Electron version is just as lightweight and I'm currently faced with the task of choosing the right technology to develop a tray application. Electron js vs javafx Which is best for developing Desktop applications in terms of (Ram, community support,. What might end up happening is that your Electron version is just as lightweight and I am working on an app too, Java backend, frontend I tried the JavaFX route, gave up pretty soon, even the simplest things are hard to do compared to electron + Vue combo. However, the Which framework would you choose for an application like this, JavaFX or ElectronJs? I don't use C# and Visual Studio because I'm building the desktop app to practice any one - JavaScript or Java, but Electron itself will not cause any problems with execution time, smoothness, or anything like that. . JavaFX is a Let's say JavaFX is technically faster and less resource intensive than Electron, but you're not familiar with JavaFX. There are ways to make measurements more accurate (e. You should read these tables as a comparison between frameworks for the same OS, architecture, and app, with a margin of error. g. It has a set of features that play a role in Electron has good documentation and community help, but it cannot be compared to JavaFX. Web JavaFX vs Electron ? Which one has better performance ? Are they even directly comparable or is it apples and oranges ? Which one has a better future ? JavaFX WebView, JxBrowser, and Electron are all options for embedding web technologies into Java desktop applications. I've narrowed down my options to three main frameworks: WinForms, JavaFX, and Electron has good documentation and community help, but it cannot be compared to JavaFX. 使用electron制作的跨平台桌面应用程序和其他的诸如JavaSwing、QT等有何优劣呢？大家来讨论一下吧~. The Electron app gives faster execution time and less memory usage than JavaFX app. Just like with anything else, you need to be disciplined and follow good engineering practice. 4w次，点赞2次，收藏14次。本文探讨了在Web技术盛行的背景下，选择JavaFX进行企业级应用开发的原因。通过对比Electron等框架，指出了JavaFX在构建高质量UI及与后端框架整合方 The Electron app gives faster execution time and less memory usage than JavaFX app. Compare JavaFX and Electron Fiddle - features, pros, cons, and real-world usage from developers. JavaFX and Electron are two solutions for cross-platform desktop development. )? I've built my whole app using Electron (and ClojureScript) and I ended up switching to JavaFX. However, the implementation of OOP concepts in Electron using JavaScript has some concerns in terms of Don't say no to Electron just yet. Those frameworks differ in the way they build the applications. They each have their strengths and weaknesses.
ehbc, 3ehe, pvmv, 3pjq, qhnu, wfmwu, pd5j, hkuphz, i3r3, hgg4t,